#Is 192 kbps good quality mp4
#Is 192 kbps good quality free

The bit rate of a lossless file depends on the density and the volume of its music. However, with lossless files, this isnвЂ™t true. As such, you can convert from one lossless format to another with no loss of quality.ДЄ higher bit rate is better, so a 256 kbps MP3 or AAC file is better than a 128 kbps file. When you rip or convert an uncompressed audio file to a lossless format, and then play that file, it is a bit-perfect copy of the original (assuming the data was read correctly from a CD). Choose the one you want to use in iTunes > Preferences > General > Import Settings. ITunes can rip or import audio files in these formats. However, if you use iTunes and Apple hardware, youвЂ™ll only encounter WAV, AIFF, MP3, AAC, and Apple Lossless, at least for music. Some of these codecs are lossy, and some are lossless. These include Ogg Vorbis, MonkeyвЂ™s Audio, Shorten, and others. You may see other audio formats too, though they are less common. While Apple adopted it early on in iTunes, Apple was not involved in its creation, and has no ownership of this format.)

#Is 192 kbps good quality mp4

(AAC, which stands for Advanced Audio Coding, is, in reality, the MP4 format, the successor to the older MP3. Lossy includes the ubiquitous MP3 and AAC formats.

#Is 192 kbps good quality free

Lossless includes formats (or codecs, short for coder-decoder algorithms) such as Apple Lossless and FLAC (the Free Lossless Audio Codec). There are two types of compression: lossless and lossy. As such, digital audio files are compressed to save space. Older, poorly-recorded material can sound just fine at 256k variable bit rate MP3.WAV and AIFF files can be quite large. For example, try some Diana Krall, Yes, Steely Dan, etc. The clarity and lack of distortion on transients will amaze. Be prepared to get knocked out by how good it can sound. Play that on a system with dynamic speakers powered with ample headroom in a large, well-treated room. Take a recording with wide dynamic range and listen to it at 24-bit/96khz (DVD-A for example). The loud/compressed modern mastering doesn't benefit as much, imo, with higher bitrates. How the material is mastered makes a big difference. 48, 96 or 192khz)help resolve well-recorded material having revealing acoustic details:ДЎ.) Cymbal, Piano, Brass and other rich harmonics.Дў.) Reverb tails will sound better - most noticeable with acoustic instruments in a real acoustic space.ДЈ.) Bass clarity, esp. * My opinion subject to change without prior notice.Д®xtra bits (16 vs. No more CDs for me.*ДЄnyone else feel the same way, or do you need a higher bitrate or lossless before you would consider making a music purchase on-line? I realize everyone who puts thought into this issue at some point or another will come to a different conclusion of what is 'good enough' for their ears and sound reproduction equipment.Д®DIT: For purposes of this thread, let's assume we're talking a home stereo system and not an iPod or car stereo. I am perfectly happy with the sound quality. I downloaded Paul Gilbert's latest album Fuzz Universe the other night and it sounds great. It was fine for the convenience of instant access to a miscellaneous song or two, but for 'serious' music purchases or an entire album I usually stuck to CDs.Д«ut now that 256kbps AAC ('iTunes Plus') is standard I think I am fine downloading all my new music purchases. I was never completely happy with the 128kbps AAC files that iTunes originally offered. For the audiophiles and picky listeners amongst us: